● Clinical and Training Practice
Wang Fei, Wang Hangping, Hao Ziwei, Gong Lingxuan, Dai Rongjuan
Objective: To systematically analyze the effects of resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise and resistance exercise combined with enhanced nutrition on physical function in elderly patients with sarcopenia. Methods: Randomized controlled trials on the intervention of resistance exercise combined with nutritional supplements or aerobic exercise for elderly patients with sarcopenia were retrieved through CNKI, VIP database, Wanfang database, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect full-text database and PubMed database, and Meta analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software. Results: In interventions targeting grip strength in elderly patients with sarcopenia, the mean effect size [MD = 2.60, 95% CI (2.38, 2.82), P<0.00001] of resistance exercise combined with enhanced nutrition was significantly greater than that of resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise [MD = 1.39, 95% CI (0.92, 1.85), P < 0.00001]. Regarding walking speed metrics, the mean standardized effect size [SMD = 0.80, 95% CI (0.60, 1.01), P < 0.00001] of resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise exceeded that of resistance exercise combined with enhanced nutrition [SMD = 0.64, 95% CI (0.42, 0.86), P<0.00001]. For the four-limb skeletal muscle mass index, the mean effect size [MD = 0.31, 95% CI (0.19, 0.43), P < 0.00001] of resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise surpassed that of resistance exercise combined with enhanced nutrition [MD = 0.11, 95% CI (0.01, 0.22), P = 0.04]. In short physical performance battery, the mean effect size [MD = 1.93, 95% CI (1.57, 2.29), P<0.00001] of resistance exercise combined with enhanced nutrition was significantly larger than that of resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise [MD = 0.86, 95% CI (0.64, 1.07), P < 0.00001]. Conclusion: Resistance training combined with enhanced nutrition and aerobic exercise shows significant improvement effects on physical function in elderly patients with sarcopenia. However, the effect sizes of these two approaches vary across different diagnostic indicators, with distinct age-related and cycle-specific emphases. In practical implementation, intervention methods should be tailored to patients′ actual conditions, time availability, needs, and preferences to provide high-quality preventive interventions.